Henry Balfour was a great traveller, he spent most of the long summer University vacations abroad. Between the winter of 1922 (when he was 59 years old) and the autumn of 1930 (aged 67), Balfour visited India, Canada, Egypt, Holland, Brazil, Kenya (twice), Uganda, South Africa, Zambia, Tanzania and Nigeria. The African countries mentioned were explored on three successive trips between 1927 and 1930. He probably travelled to other countries too, for which there is no evidence. Henry Balfour therefore visited Africa many times. He travelled to southern Africa four times, and also visited Kenya, Uganda, other East African countries and Nigeria. He travelled to Egypt in the spring of 1926.
Here is a summary of his African travels, it will be noted how much of the time he spent searching for stone tools, particularly in southern Africa. My thanks to Fran Larson for preparing these summaries during the Relational Museum project from Balfour's field diaries:
1905 South Africa
Pitt Rivers Museum, Manuscript Collections, Balfour Papers 1/5, diary of a voyage to South Africa (1905), pp. 7-8.
Pitt Rivers Museum, Manuscript Collections, Balfour Papers 2/3, diary of a voyage to Nigeria (1930), p.16.
Balfour gave more than 2,000 stone tools he had collected in Africa to the Pitt Rivers Museum.
2 are from Nigeria
13 are from Egypt
29 are from Kenya
266 from South Africa
1,765 are from Zimbabwe (Khami and Victoria Falls)
Balfour published three accounts of African stone tools, two in the records of the [Royal] Anthropological Institute and one for the Royal African Society:
1. Note upon an implement of palaeolithic type from the Victoria Falls, Zambesi. [Journal of the Anthropological Institute, vol. 36 (Jan-June 1906) pp. 170-1]
Balfour wished in the paper to throw additional light upon the question of the 'antiquity of stone implements in the Zambesi Valley'. In September 1905, Balfour had spent a week at the Victoria Falls and spent 'a portion of my time to searching for Stone Age remains':
Below the Falls, on the plateau which originally formed the bottom of the wide Zambesi Valley, and through which the deep Batoka Gorge has been cut, I found ... quantities of artificially flakes and rudely worked implements of chalcedony and other stone considerably patinated in most cases. Of these, some were almost as sharp as they were when freshly made, and do not convey the impression of great antiquity; others, on the contrary, show evidence of considerable attrition by rolling, caused, no doubt, by river action, and appear to have been brought down from a distance by the river, and deposited by it on the spot where they are now found. ... I wish particularly to call attention to one specimen which I found on my last day's hunt for implements.
While walking in company with my friend, Colonel H.W. Feilden,[1] along a piece of newly-made road on the left bank immediately above the Falls, I found amongst the coarse stones with which the road was roughly metalled, the implement ... It is of chalcedony, 13.7 cm long, 9.7 cm wide, 6.6 cm thick, and weighs just over 26 ounces. ... it is, as regards shape and manufacture, thoroughly palaeolithic in type, resembling completely a type of flint implements well known from the River-Drift gravels of Western Europe and England. It has a rounded butt for holding in the hand, and the opposite end has been carefully flaked to produce a cutting edge. [Balfour, 1906: 170]
Balfour had reported his visit in the Museum's Annual Report for 1905:
I took advantage of the meeting of the British Association in S. Africa which enabled me to revisit the coastal towns and to cover much country which was new to me. I read a paper to the Anthropological section of the Association on “The Native Musical Instruments of S. Africa.” While travelling about I was able to collect many specimens for the Museum. During a week spent on the Zambesi River, I made observations upon the evidences of a Stone Age in the district, and collected stone implements of very early type, pointing to the former existence of a culture resembling that of the Palaeolithic period in Europe. I also secured one of the interesting ‘friction-drums’ (Mashukulumbwe tribe) characteristic of the country north of the Zambesi, a type which I have been trying for many years to procure.
I visited two of the Ancient ruins in Rhodesia (Khami and Umtali) and collected some objects on the spot, receiving others through the kindness of Mr E M Andrews of Umtali and Mr F Meynell of Bulawayo. I collected together a considerable number of decorated potsherds from these sites, and these proved to be very interesting, as I discovered that some of the pottery of the ruins was undoubtedly carved with stone flakes after it had been baked hard. I know of no other similar instances. This survival of the use of stone in an Iron Age, as applied to a particular purpose, is interesting. Specimens of the pottery and stone flakes and tools are now in the Museum.
Balfour concluded that the form of the tool was 'typically palaeolithic' and suggested that it 'belonged to a very rudimentary condition of culture, comparable to that of the River-Drift period of N.E. Europe'. [Balfour, 1906: 171] He confirmed that it was 'an example of an implement taken from an ancient river deposit of the Zambesi, of which the patination and abraded surface point to a considerable antiquity'. [Balfour, 1906: 171] He believed that 'the combined evidence seems to point strongly to the ancientness of the manufacture of stone tools in the Zambesi region:
The specimen which I have described appears to me to furnish more complete evidence of high antiquity than any other which I have so far seen from this district, and it is, I think, of interest, in view of the evidence of a very remote Stone Age in South Africa, which is gradually being discovered in other districts'. [Balfour, 1906: 171]
There are a large number of accessioned but uncatalogued stone tools from the Victoria Falls area in the Pitt Rivers Museum collected and donated by Balfour, this one might be 1906.84.5 'Chalcedony implement of 'river drift' palaeolithic type, found on banks of Zambesi R. 1905 (from ancient river gravel deposits on left bank near Victoria Falls)', the only one that has any kind of detailed description.
Work on the Victoria Falls material after 1906
Balfour reported in the Museum Annual Report for 1908, his further work on this material:
A glazed cabinet with exhibition case added has been placed in the upper gallery for the collection of stone implements from the Zambesi River, which I made in 1905 and 1907. The geological evidence points to many of these being of very high antiquity, and the correspondence in type between the Zambesi implements and those of the River-Drift period in Western Europe is remarkable. I have made a model of the Victoria Falls and the immediate neighbourhood, to illustrate the geological conditions under which the implements were found.
Not only did Balfour continue to work on the artefacts he had already collected, in the Museum Annual Report for 1910 it is clear that he thought this work was still ongoing as research:
During the Long Vacation, at the invitation of the South African Association, I gave a series of lectures in most of the principal towns in South Africa, mainly upon subjects with which the Museum is specially concerned. During my tour I collected many objects for the Museum, and I was able to pay a third visit to the Victoria Falls of the Zambesi with a view to continuing the archaeological research work in that region upon which I had been engaged in previous years. Although the time at my disposal was very brief, the results were very satisfactory and I brought back a further collection of stone implements of very early date to add to my previous collection. The archaeology of the region is now represented by a far more complete collection than exists anywhere else.
In 1911 this work was still continuing:
My own researches have been mainly devoted to the remains of the Stone Age in S. Africa. In addition to my own material collected upon the Zambesi River and its tributaries, I have examined a very large collection of stone implements from S. Africa sent to me from the Museum at Kimberley for diagnosis. I am preparing a report upon these at the request of the Curator, Miss M. Wilman.
2. '25. Occurrence of 'Cleavers' of Lower-Palaeolithic Type in Northern Nigeria' Man, vol. 34, (February 1934) pp. 21-4.
When I was in Northern Nigeria, three years ago, while staying at Jos, on the Bauchi Plateau, I examined, with the kind permission of Mr Russell, the collection of stone implements which had been deposited in the Government Office, and which included a number of implements of the Lower-palaeolithic facies, discovered largely in the course of tin-mining operations. Among them I was much interested to find well-defined examples of the 'cleaver' type. Of two of these I made rough sketches [included in the article]. As I had only a very brief time at my disposal, the sketches were very hurriedly made, and cannot be regarded as accurate in detail, but the general characteristics and distribution of the flaking are shown.' [Balfour, 1934: 22]
From the three examples, Balfour believed that they 'indicated that the 'cleaver' was one of the well-defined tools of that part of West Africa during what is presumed to have been a Lower-palaeolithic culture phase. He concluded that 'there can be little doubt, I think, that the 'cleavers' of West and South Africa are closely related morphologically and there is a great likelihood that it may be possible to link up the Lower-palaeolithic implements of 'cleaver' type throughout their dispersal, or at any rate, the greater part of it.' [Balfour, 1934: 23]
Balfour refers to several cleavers 'I have for some years placed on exhibition' in the Pitt Rivers Museum including one from Warren Hill, Suffolk and one small cleaver from Willingdon Hill, Sussex both donated by S.G Hewlett and other specimens from Spain, South Africa and India. The Warren Hill item must be 1927.73.17, 'Very large axe like implement made from a huge flint flake, plano-convex (?Chelleo Acheulian) Warren Hill Suffolk 1897' (the only item from Warren Hill in the Hewlett collection) and the one from Willingdon Hill cannot be positively identified.
3. ‘Notes on a collection of ancient stone implements from Ejura, Ashanti’ Journal of the Royal African Society vol. 12, no. 45, pp. 1-16
Balfour published an article in the Journal of the Royal African Society on stone tools in 1912. The article discusses 150 stone implements collected by R.S Rattray, 'a former student of mine' [2][Balfour, 1912: 1]:
The specimens were dug up during the operations concerning the extension between Mampon and Ejura of the new road leading northward from Kumassi. The collection consists almost entirely of "celt" (axes, adzes or chisels) of neolithic type. There are no arrowhead, spearheads, scrapers, borers, or other types of implements usually associated with neolithic celts where these are at all numerous [Balfour, 1912: 2]
Balfour also enumerates 'the localities of West Africa ... from which I have records of the finding of celts of neolithic type. [Balfour, 1912: 2] He concludes after this list that the 'neolithic celts' are 'very widely dispersed throughout the region extending from Nigeria to Ashanti, and no doubt, the area will be greatly extended'. [Balfour, 1912: 4] Balfour repeats the fact that other types of neolithic implement appear to be missing, and that 'the stone celts are greatly valued by the natives, who regard them as "thunderbolts" and eagerly search for them for the sake of their magical properties. This belief in the celestial origin of stone axes ... does not seem to apply to such other forms of stone implements as occur in the region, and it is natural that the celt should predominate greatly in the stone-age finds preserved by natives, who may readily overlook other types, through their attaching no particular importance to them.' [Balfour, 1912: 4]
Balfour describes the manner and method of finding the celts in detail, including:
The average depth at which the stone axes have been found is about 2 1/2 feet. One was 4 feet below the surface, and another was as much as 5 feet down. All were in undisturbed soil. ... There does not appear to have been any evidence of a stratification of the types of celts ... Mr Rattray went to the spot and was shown exactly where they were found. Surface finds did not occur. [Balfour, 1912: 5-6]
Balfour describes the finds, he divides them into ten types. Balfour described 'a spot on the road about 10 miles from Kumassi, where there is an outcrop of granite .... Practically the whole surface of one huge granite rock ... is scored with hundreds of grooves running in all directions. ... It is more than probable that these grooves were formed by the makers of the celts, who must have finally shaped the implements by grinding them upon a hard rock surface. It is, in fat, reasonable to believe that these scored rocks indicate the sites of manufacture of the celts. [Balfour, 1912: 9]
Balfour then discusses the more recent history of the 'thunderbolts', concluding:
From the value attached to the neolithic celts throughout West Africa, one may say, indeed, that their former practical and prosaic utility as everyday implements during the Stone Age is almost outshone by the value set upon them in their magical and mythical capacity by the Iron Age natives of today, who, misinterpreting their true nature and origin, have developed a cult around them associated with the god of thunder and lightning, the "hurler of stones".
As he so often did, he concludes the entire article by pleading for more artefacts:
may I add that I shall feel very grateful for any specimens of localised African stone implements for the Pitt Rivers Museum in Oxford, and any information relating to them. [Balfour, 1912: 16]
Balfour had reported the arrival of the Ashanti tools in the 1912 Museum Annual Report:
The collection of stone implements acquired on the spot by Mr. R.S. Rattray in Ashanti is an instance in point. I have described this collection fully in the Journal of the African Society of London. I have been able to strengthen the collection of Stone Age implements by the acquirement of many rare types, many gaps in the series having been filled; some of the examples are particularly fine.
Balfour, Henry. 1906 'Note upon an implement of palaeolithic type from the Victoria Falls, Zambesi'. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, vol. 36 (Jan-June 1906) pp. 170-1
Balfour, Henry. 1912. ‘Notes on a collection of ancient stone implements from Ejura, Ashanti’ Journal of the Royal African Society vol. 12, no. 45, pp. 1-16
Balfour, Henry. 1934 'Occurrence of 'Cleavers' of Lower-Palaeolithic Type in Northern Nigeria' Man, vol. 34, (February 1934) pp. 21-4
[1] Henry Wemyss Feilden (1838-1921) a soldier, naturalist and Fellow of the Geological Society and the Royal Geographical Society. He served in Natal, the Transvaal and the Cape Flats during the wars in South Africa (1880-1902). He collected many stone tools in southern Africa.
[2] Robert Sutherland Rattray (1881-1938) worked for the British colonial service in West Africa.